Get over the illusion, reality has hit!

Why are liberals surprised at Barack's lousy showing? It was to be expected. Unlike what the liberal media spins, Barack's far from a great debater. All he can do is theatrically read well from a teleprompter. That's what connected with liberal dimwits last time, which then got him elected. That and the fact that McCain was more than lousy!

But this time around its a different ballgame. Barack's almost bankrupted America with his radical socialist agenda and worse, he's a facing a guy who once worked for a consulting company! Can it get any worse for him!?

I've said this umpteen times before. Perceptions can only get you a first buy. After that reality hits! The real Barack has been laid bare by a consummate professional who is his opponent this time. I agree when it comes to consumption, there'll always be consumers who'll keep buying because they buy into illusions that marketers spin, more so when the outcome to a buy cannot be empirically assessed. 

With Barack, the post-buy measurement stares straight into your face! 

Barack's screwed up America! 

Big Time!

Note Dr. Beatty, 'President Barack Hussein "kill list" Obama says that he needs four more years to fix the economy.  Never mind that the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew at a "less than spectacular" rate of 1.3 percent in the second quarter of 2012.  Or that George Walker Bush's deficit-to-GDP ratio was 2.7 percent, while Obama's deficit-to-GDP ratio is 8.9 percent (Reagan's, by the way, was 4.2 percent).  Or that today's economy is far worse than it was in 2008.  You remember, the one Obama claimed that his policies would correct.  So, considering today's economy, despite what Obama (claims he) was not told, and after three and a half years of his economic policies, can any one of you Democrats/liberals/progressives (yes, that's intended to be a pejorative term) suggest why the next four years would be any different?
Regarding food stamps, there are today a record number of U.S. citizens receiving food stamps (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP).  As this chart shows, the increase in food stamps predates Obama, but he perfected the increase.  Under the eight years of Bush, spending grew from $19 billion to $39 billion.  That's bad enough.  But in only four years under Obama, the spending has grown to $85 billion, more than double Bush's highest year.  In fact, Obama has spent more ($290 billion) in four years than Bush spent ($237 billion) in eight.
All the food stamp spending is going on while the deficit and national debt continue to rise.  The national debt stood at $10.626 trillion when Bush left office.  That is bad enough.  It was $15.566 trillion in May 2012, and is now over $16 trillion.  Bush added $4 trillion (according to Obama) to the national debt in eight years.  Obama has added more than that in less than four years, with no end in sight.'

The 'illusionary' buy will continue for liberal dimwits. But I hope the undecideds wake up to reality. I hope they vote Romney, so America won't be dismantled in the next four years, and turned into a third world socialist hell!


JACOB said…
Hi Prof. Ray

Good to see your write ups on American politicians. How come you are not writing much on Indian politics and politicians who put the country in a mess? Hope to read more on Indian politics.


Jacob Alexander

Popular Posts