Skip to main content

Don't hop jobs? You must be dumb!


Job hopping is in. Most youngsters today hop jobs at a rate that is alarming. Take the BPO / Call Center sector for instance. Job-hopping amongst young people working in the BPO sector has become the norm. It is common for youngsters to switch jobs for a few hundred rupees. The impact on the industry, is that attrition rises to levels that are not sustainable. Attrition levels of 30 - 40 percent in BPOs are now considered 'normal' while call centers routinely deal with a turnover of 60 - 75 percent of their workforce each year. Wage inflation is also rampant in the industry. Wages are being projected by leading manpower consultants, to rise by between 15 - 25 percent in 2007.

But the 'wage rise' is not the only reason why youngsters hop jobs. Shruti Ravindran in the Outlook writes that 'capitalising on a highly mobile job market, an increasing number of young Indians are rejecting the fabled Indian drone-worker ethic in favour of greater mental stimulation, constant learning, and the heady joy of loving what they do.

These young people are reinventing conventional wisdom, by saying it’s OK to change your career as often as you like, and there are more paths to a fulfilling life than sticking to the straight-and-narrow of one ‘safe’ job. They are part of a global trend. As BBC commenter Tim Marlowe said on his trend-tracking radio show recently, "Specialisation is a way of stopping you from larger knowledge systems."

Pic : www.pro-cv.co.uk

Comments

Unknown said…
Dear Mr Titus,
The people who are having talent were not been identified properly either by the management or by the HR process in the industry. As a result, are suffering for their careers. For eg:-- In the Target Corp., an employee who has done her masters in Stats&Maths was been asked to do simply a process of reporting since 8 months and was not interested to continue any more. She feels she may not forget what se has learnt in her yester's. There are lot of flips in the HR processes itself.
Regards
Anil Govindu

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).