Skip to main content

Innovation Addiction

Brushing my teeth is a mechanical activity performed twice a day without too much of fuss, except when the phone rings. Then the 'nightmare' begins.

Oral B has come up with a toothbrush that's been designed supposedly to ensure that all my teeth are well cleaned. But this 'innovatively designed' toothbrush that's curved all over, even the bristles have not been spared, sadly does not have a flat base. So every time the phone rings, I can't rest the toothbrush on the side of my sink in a way where it remains steady and does not smear the sink with toothpaste. So much for an innovatively designed toothbrush.

'Innovation' being the buzzword, most companies are so addicted to wanting to innovate, they change a simple toothbrush into something I can't even recognise. All in the name of helping me 'brush better'. Innovations must carry value in the sense they have to make consumer's lives better and easier. If not, it just ends up getting a bathroom sink smeared with toothpaste.


Sandy said…
When I purchase a toothbrush, I just buy one.I dont go to lengths to see what extra value the brush has got, cmon its a damn brush for Christ's sake!! Well the only value add I might look at is if it offers something free..nothing more.
So personally I think advertising or positioning a brush based on its innovative mechanics is a no brainer!
HP invents IBM thinks with its thinkpads and thinkstations.. ya need 2 consistently innovate to stay in the race..
Ya may argue tat technology needs to keep gettyn updated, but here I divert to sumthin trivial like hairstylists n saloons- it doesn;t really matter a damn 2 neone if ya hair were curved inwards/outwards, soft/hard permed, relaxed/ softened/ straightened, colored blonde/blue/flamered; yet, there are hives of peple who get into gettyn ya hair look n feel betta.. Ya need all these zillion innovations and upgradations ryte from 3d Maya animations to Malaika's silicon b#$&$-they keep the hype alive. oRAL-B needs to hyperventilate too- ya sink prob needs to get tat makeover too, from tat borin mauve to those moovin streaks of smeared red/white... [:)]
Ray, I cud be optimistic at times, albeit a 'SINK'in one.. [:)] (LUCKY MADEOVER bathroom SINK)
Ray Titus said…

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).