Skip to main content

Communicating Water Woes

There's this interesting scene in the drama series, West Wing, where the President (Charlie Sheen) reacts angrily to the hatred expressed by some people over his daughter, Zoey (Elisabeth Moss) dating Charlie (Dule Hill), wanting to defend their rights and privacies. The President's advisors tell him not to react, as that would raise the decibel levels about an issue, that should best be left quiet.

The lesson in this story is one that PepsiCo. India can learn. Recent reports seem to suggest (note : no official confirmation on the same as yet) that the soft drink company in India plans to release a communication campaign featuring its CEO, Indra Nooyi and the way she spent her childhood. The communique would show how Ms. Nooyi as a child used to get up early in the morning to fill buckets of water, as water was a scarce commodity those days. The campaign centers around her middle class upbringing with issues such as 'water' thrown in.

Is water a sensitive issue in India? You bet it is. With access to clean water still a luxury among large sections of people in India, it is quite the 'burning' issue everywhere. Take Bangalore, for example. Right now, with three days of water cuts, due to a pipeline repair issue, Bangalore is parched. Tempers are running high.

In the midst of it all, any reference to 'water' by someone like PepsiCo, far from getting people to believe in the company's concern for this precious resource, will only bring back memories of how Soft Drink manufacturers in India have been responsible for destroying underground 'water tables' around the country. Remember Plachimada?

For the moment, the smart thing to do? Yeah, CSR is important, but don't let it bring back sour memories. Steer clear of anything that can touch a raw nerve. At times, its better to stay put, stay shut.

Comments

extremely true..
its like adding friggyn fuel 2 the fire..

weird, wen i sumtymes go to a bank like ICICI, and people have no time for you and ya gotta wait in long, long queues, and then you see a poster sayin 'hum hain na'- it is an extremely prick..

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).