Skip to main content

Can Ad campaigns assuage safety fears?

As a part of the Air Safety week, the Ministry of Civil Aviation has released full page print Ads in leading newspapers. The Headline asks, 'Is the thought of 'human error' making you lose your appetite? Just read further and you will feel much better today.'

The Ad goes on to say, 'Relax. Our pilots and Air Traffic Control Officers undergo the highest levels of training.....'

The ad then concludes that Indian skies are 'one of the safest in the world'. Its understandable the need for this campaign. Indian air travellers have been frightened out of their wits over the recent 'near-miss escapes' in our skies. Thankfully no major mishaps have yet taken place, except for the one involving a Saudi Arabian Jumbo and a Kazhak Airlines plane.

A consumer's involvement with a product or service is primarily dictated by the risks associated with the purchase. These risks in turn could be driven by financial, health, physical, social or emotional factors. In the case of air travellers, the involvement levels with the service provided would be among the highest, on factors of safety. After all, no traveller wants to ever fly with the fear of a mishap hanging over his head. So, the campaign definitely helps in assuaging fears. But what would help more is if there are no more reports in the media about these 'near misses'. Or may I say, if there are no more of the 'near misses'!


Sandy said…
I am not too sure if Indian skies are the safest as the Ad claims.To be honest, I dont think the Ad hits home at all.(personal opinion)
However I do agree with you when you say that involvement with a service provided is highest,on factors of safety.
Maybe something like the Virgin safety video would go a long way in comforting people rather than an Ad which just states something which not many think is true.
Sandy said…

to view it please paste the link together

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).