Skip to main content

Country of origin effects or Racism?

The 'country of origin effects' still seem to linger on, at least when it comes to Indian products and services. A discussion in my class today centered around apparel brands in India. The point of debate was whether brands from the Aditya Birla Nuvo stable such as Loius Philippe, Allen Solly, Van Heusen and Peter England would benefit from being identified as brands from the Aditya Birla Group. Or would it make better sense to not have this association revealed, as then, consumers may perceive them to be MNC brands resulting in 'premium associations' that would justify the higher price tag?

There seems to be a similar scenario when it comes to the Taj Group. The Taj Group of Hotels' interest in a stake in the Orient Express Luxury hotel chain has been spurned. ET reports that 'The luxury hotel chain has cited that any association of its brands and properties with the 'predominantly domestic' Indian hotel chain would result in an erosion of the brand and business value of its 'global portfolio of luxury hotels and unique travel experiences.'

Paul M White, president and CEO of Orient Express Hotels has stated that, 'We believe any association of our luxury brands and properties with your (Taj Group) brands and properties would result in a reduction in the value of our brands and of our business.'

Now, is there any grain of truth in whats been stated or should we start bellowing about 'racist biases'? Remember the Mittal-Arcelor tiff?

Comments

Manasa said…
It's just sad to know that great quality is being rejected just cause it sounds Indian..And it's even more disgusting (not surprising tho) to know that Indian consumers share the same perception when it comes to Indian make.. Esp with the youth getting excited about movies like Rang De Basanti and the whole patriotism flood. It's ironical to know that higher chances of rejecting brands like Louis Philippe and Allen Solly, had they sounded Indian, would come from the same group.

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).