Skip to main content

What's common to flaming Fords & ICC?

The answer?

Simple...both refused to accept that there's a problem either with the flaming Ford or the umpires, and looked away. The result? Customers and viewers alienated, respectively!

When customers called Ford Motor Company about their flaming Fords, guess what the company told them? Call your Insurance company. Well, this non-responsive attitude in the end resulted in, till date, a recall of almost 11 million cars and trucks since 2005 because of a clear danger that the vehicles could erupt in flames without warning.

The ICC could do well to remember the flaming Ford fiasco. If they had given it a thought, they would not have backed the umpires who messed up, more so, while officiating in the cricket test at Sydney. How did the ICC spokesperson react to umpiring blunders? "The standard test match playing conditions are signed by the respective board, and the condition states that neither team has a right to object to an umpire's appointment. There is little ICC can do."

On the contrary there's a lot the ICC can and must do, if they care about cricket crazy viewers in India. They must issue a statement admitting to the blunders and also say that they would investigate thoroughly into what happened so as to clear the mess. Pronto. Else, they must face a similar scenario as the one Ford Motor company faced.

The larger lesson here? Most 'entrenched establishments' tend to ignore any information that puts them in bad light, choosing to cover up their messes by feigning ignorance. Now that will eventually lead to a huge loss of face and will also ruin any credibility they possess. On the other hand if they react with a promise to quickly try and undo what's already been done, to the extent possible, they regain their lost credibility and even more, they may be rewarded with customer loyalty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).