The rule book and its misuse
Though legally valid, throwing the contractual obligation line (with just 3 days of the contract period left) at Harshita Saxena is no attempt at safeguarding the sanctity of contracts. Instead its an attempt at assuaging a frizzled ego, and garnering some undeserved publicity for a drowning Gladrags.
Isn't this what you come to expect from the powers that be? Use of the rule book when it suits them?