Skip to main content

Right to Live & Reason to Kill

I guess what happened today morning is what got me to finally write, what I am about to. While reading the paper early this morning, I heard the bedroom door creak. Scampering out of it was Jaden, who soon got his li'l legs to carry him past me, to the kitchen where Alphy was. He sprang into her arms and planted a broad morning kiss. Alphy's grin was huge.

Could there be a better start to a morning?

But at times there aren't. A few days ago I woke up to news of a brutal murder, of a family of three in Bangalore. The murdered included a girl of eight. Reading the story was heartbreaking. It seems the girl just before she was done to death was sketching something on paper. Because when her body was found, beside it was pencil and paper.

The police seem to be close to cracking the case. I hope they do. And then I hope the honorable courts find whoever responsible for death of the child, not worthy to live. I hope its a death penalty for the murderers.

Now there's a distinct possibility that my reasoning is driven by emotions, especially since I am a father to a three year old son. But I know it isn't. Because I believe society must find a minuscule minority who commit such crimes not fit to their lives. In letting them live, you disrespect the right to life of a murdered li'l girl. Of course, I am in no way suggesting that opportunity for reform be denied to criminals. In fact, every chance possible must be given for reform. Yet for people who commit crimes sans any semblance of humanity, no such favours should be given. And in denying it, and doing away with them, society rids itself of evil. Also, let this be known, in doing so, society in no way turns barbaric. If society didn't, call that heartless and barbaric.

As John McAdams at Marquette University's Department of Political Science said on deterrence (oft quoted as to why death Penalty should be abolished), "If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call."

I know Human lives are no comparison to anything else, yet, I think I may draw some parallels. In business too, there come times when the plug must be pulled. Off brands that fail consumers. Letting them potter around is unfair to other brands in the firm, that do well. Or brands that can replace them. 'Turnaround' is a good idea. Business History has its set of turnaround brands that have bounced back. Yet, when one's sure the brand's beyond repair, its better to show no mercy. Its better to pull the plug.

Its the right and the most sensible thing to do. Period.

For readers interested in the contentious issue of Death Penalty, I'd recommend ProDeathPenalty. Its definitely worth the visit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…