Skip to main content

Say Tata, Bye Bye to Rajeev

Do I think its a good idea for Ratan Tata to have responded to Rajeev Chandresekhar in the manner he did? No. Why? Because the latter jumped at the opportunity to respond back by saying Ratan Tata's trying to make it personal. Which of course isn't true, but the larger public won't ever know because they won't ever read Ratan Tata's 14 page response that includes Rajeev's 2002 fax, and Ratan's response to that. Currently in the eyes of the public, it seems like a personal spat's on between two corporate guys. The media too is playing it that way.

Now what should Tata then have done, or do?

Before I give my recommendation let me state what I feel about the Tata Group. I don't think India has seen or will see a more ethical and principled business group as the Tatas. They have done more for India than any other business group. They have done it sans an eye on publicity which is what most other businesses seek. As Aakar puts it, 'This is not CSR (corporate social responsibility) or other corporate varnish: It’s pure philanthropy'. But having said that, I also think the Tatas have had their image dented. So, back to the earlier question. What should Tata have done, or can do?

My advice, engage with the stakeholder who's currently going through a rethink on the Group. That is the public at large. Let the likes of Rajeev be. Engaging with him is a mistake because you come across as someone in a slanging match. Of course, you need to respond to his allegations. But don't do it one to one. Instead open channels of communication with the public and respond to allegations with data material, the way you've done in the letter to Rajeev. Open a link on your website to take questions from the public. Respond and make it public. Keep a blog channel going, reinforcing what you've always been saying, that the Group's done no wrong. And for God's sake, do your PR internally. Get the best people in and form an internal division.

I believe the 2G episode is but a hiccup to the Tata Group. It'll take time for them to recover, but they will. And then we the public will get back to what we've always thought about them. A group that puts principles first. Profits later. Because that's the way they are, and the way they'll be.

Also, read Aakar Patel's take on India's most principled Business Group here.


Unknown said…
I would like to thnkx for the efforts you’ve put in writing this blog. I’m hoping the same high-grade blog post from you in the upcoming also.

logo design experts

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…