Skip to main content

Regulation is why cutoffs go up

The stupidity surrounding cutoff marks is unbelievable! The solution being offered? Lower the cutoff marks. Change the grading system. Unbelievable again!

The solution to the kind of dumb clamour to get into certain colleges is to ask the colleges to lower their so called 'standards'? But then again, I am not surprised. What do you expect in a country where regulation rules? Where regulation ensures there's artificial scarcity? In this case scarcity of college seats. Of course the fallout to regulation is abnormal demand that drives up whatever it is the seller is offering. In this case the driven up entity is cutoff marks.

The real answer to such absurdity is to increase supply. Increasing supply in turn requires that regulation be throttled. Which of course isn't forthcoming as we know crony capitalism (read socialism) is what thrives here. If any country wants consumers to be kings it requires that as many sellers are brought into market to compete, and peddle their wares. Such wares include education too.

For the moment that's a pipe dream. Which means the cutoffs stay!


Piyush said…
100% cut off only for science students in India's premier commerce college SRCC. Its a subjective stand on the institution part to not allow non-commerce student with unrealistic cut-off (which only 1-2 student must have scored).
Your argument is valid on demand and supply, but this also fosters non-movement of students from one stream to another. It restricts young generation to try out new field (in case they fail or cannot make the most out of it).
Ray Titus said…
That 'non-movement' Piyush you refer to, is not because SRCC isn't 'wise' enough, its because there aren't other instituions that allow such 'moves'.

Again, guess why? Blame regulation. Because regulation is why there aren't smarter, 'movement-allowing' instituions, that could either have come from the West or been set up by 'smart' people within.
Prof, agreed on the demand-supply situation and quantity. But, how do we ensure quality of education? AICTE gives approval easily in engineering and Management. Hundreds of institutes mushroom (to make money) and many seats remain vacant due to oversupply, but poor quality.

Even the ones that graduate are not employable.

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).