Skip to main content

Why political violence is natural to Kerala

The recent spate of political murders in the state of Kerala has left people there shocked and anguished. Everyone wonders how a state with the most literacy rate and the best socio-economic indicators can witness such mindless violence. Note that Kerala also has a history of political violence and a recent RTI enquiry has revealed that 56 people have died in a decade as a result of such violence.

Now its natural for anyone sane to wonder why people would kill in a bloodthirsty manner in the name of political party. But such wonder is misplaced. Political violence in fact is what should come naturally to a state like Kerala. Don't for a moment think Kerala owes its literacy and socio-economic development to political activism. Attribute such progress instead to the enterprising Malayalee who's sacrificed much to move to places where he engaged in fruitful economic activity that resulted in his personal prosperity. This personal prosperity is the real and only reason behind Kerala's economic progress and literacy. It's no thanks to the state. It's thanks to the 'working' individual.

Coming back to the violence and why its natural, note. When it comes to politics in Kerala, the default lesson taught to every political worker is that the collective (read, party) is above the individual. The individual doesn't matter. Its the party that needs to be worshipped, at the cost of subjugating and subverting individual liberties. Politics in Kerala relegates the value of an individual to nothing. Is it any wonder then that people die in political violence?

Societies that allow the collective to lord over the individual must not harbour any hope for progress. Political activism in India may not mirror what's happening in Kerala, but what's still disturbing is that its a thin line that divides the two. If its communism that enjoys its place in the sun in Kerala, its socialism that constantly rears its ugly head in India. As a nation we still hang on to the idiocy of according the collective greater status over the individual. All in the name of social progress.

Raising the collective over the individual is immoral, because such arrangements give the individual no rights except those that ultimately serve the collective. As I mentioned before, nations that hold such precepts dear have a zero chance at progress. Also, such nations present marketers with diminished hope. If individual liberty supersedes the collective's, nations prospers, marketers thrive.

Individual liberty always translates into producer-consumer liberty. Which means, producers can produce without fear from the collective. Consumers can consume, again with no such fears.

Here's hoping as a nation we get to that. Here's hoping the political worker in Kerala realises its the individual that matters most, not the party. Here's hoping I ain't hoping the impossible. 

Comments

Matz said…
You Hit the nail on that one Ray.
Great Post.

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).