Skip to main content

Who deserves taxpayer money?

'Like any other human activity, sports too should be seen in the right perspective: how it helps the community at large in becoming better. If sports do not serve a social purpose, it’s a useless exercise that helps only those who play or sponsor it or earrn their bread and butter through it. If a boxer or shooter wins a medal, gets bags of cash from the state and puts it all into his house and cars and private academies and personal indulgences, it’s like throwing people’s hard-earned money into the gutters. Why should the tax-payers’ money be given to an individual? Just because he brings some 15-seconds of national glory – the glory that is not enough to provide us anything that really matters.' 

Really Shoban, that's the best you can come up with


The right perspective to sports is helping the community at large in becoming better? 


Ha ha ha!


Pity you have zero understanding of human behavior! Pity you have no idea that selfish self pursuit does more for any community than socialist nonsense. Sixty years of socialist hell and you still want more of the same? You're not willing to bet on selfishness? Guess they should make in mandatory that journalists learn free market economics in journalism school! 


For a moment consider the idiocy in Shoban's question. He asks, 'Why should taxpayers money be given to an individual?' Smart question dude! But real question you should be asking is a bit different. The answer to that question will help you figure the beginning to how to make things better in India!


Shoban, the real question is, 'Why should taxpayer money be given to your fantasy benefactor, the government?'


If you think taxpayer money is wasted on winning athletes, what makes you think it will be any different if its the government we hand our hard earned money over to? Sure, Saina isn't going to build a hospital with her tax payer funded prize money, but you think the government's going to? And even if the government does build one its quite probable that it ends up killing babies (some even call it a genocide). Plus you think the government's got the brains or the desire to build institutions that alleviate problems of society? Sixty years of gross mismanagement of public money and you still think we should be plying the government with more taxpayer money!


Don't you know the only reason government should exist is so we can be assured of our individual liberty? I guess you don't because you probably are a hardcore socialist who incidentally works for a publication that's as market oriented as it can get!


Shoban, I am not surprised you, as many others don't get it. In fact it isn't you, its what we are taught, and in many ways its who we are. For starters, its only welfare economics that's shoved down our throats in our years of learning. Plus what makes it worse for us is as a society we have zero belief or consideration for what is individual liberty. We are forever glorifying the 'collective'.


That's a double whammy.


That's probably why you write what you write.


What can save us Shoban isn't the government or any well managed social efforts. What can is free market capitalism. 


Pity you don't know.

Comments

Unknown said…
Hi,Prof.Ray Titus you are right, taxpayer money should be used by the Indian government in public welfare.It should not be wasted upon useless sports activities because the money collected by government in the form of tax is the money earned by citizen after hard working.
I want to give one good new information to the readers through following link:
A place where www.agrarealestate.co.in you can find solution.

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…