Skip to main content

The liberty-curtailing danger in 'Dark is Beautiful' campaign

The 'Dark is Beautiful' campaign, I am afraid may have got the intent right, but the act wrong. Messing up on the latter means the campaign will first be ineffective, and second, dangerous. Ineffective because the campaign understands nothing about the way the human brain responds to stimuli. Dangerous because it barks up the wrong tree, and takes on the liberty-denying mantle of 'regulation' to ensure 'social fairness'.

Note, unconditioned responses come naturally to homo sapiens. Meaning, pre-learned responses that may on the surface seem discriminatory, but aren't, will invariably show up when sensory organs act on stimuli. Take babies for example. Symmetry in faces is what babies prefer. In fact babies respond more positively to attractive, symmetrical faces. Stretch that and you will see that an unconditioned response to certain skin tone may not be discriminatory at all, but just a natural reaction. From a geographical perspective such responses will follow the demand-supply rule. In a country where 90% have darker skin tones, the remaining 10% will garner the lion's share of eyeballs. Those greater eyeballs will, post multiple exposures (read, learning) translate into a preference (read attitude formation) for the minority.

The D is B campaign can do whatever it wants, bet it can't and won't reverse the current preference trend. Not until genetics realigns skin tones in generations to follow.

On an important added note, the D is B campaign is a dangerous one. Using the regulatory route it attempts to stifle what is a fundamental right. All in the name of arresting a discriminatory practice. The right to communicate by playing into a prejudice, however distasteful, should be one given to marketers. Sure, many may not like it, but what about those who want to hear the message and then make up their mind on their own? Why should they be denied the message because a handful believe such messages propagate a prejudice? Denials by default ascribe superior positions to regulators. Consumers are mindless idiots is what is assumed, and so regulators must intervene.

Plus even if the 'whitening' message propagates a prejudice, a root-cause analysis will show the problem as one steeped in social mores, and not marketer practices. It isn't the big bad marketer who's to blame, its culture and society.

The problem with the D is B campaign is that it steps outside of the space of a social campaign. It transgresses into the territory of liberty-curtailment.

That is as dangerous as any campaign can get. So, beware!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…