Skip to main content

Denying either Producers or Consumers is Tyranny over Free Choice!

When Amit Srivastava at the IRC advocates reining in PepsiCo's planned $5 billion investment plans for India by 2020, he gives call to TYRANNY over free choice. Amit's is the kind of statist urge that strips citizens of liberty, relegating them to being mere vassals of the state.

The core of Amit's argument is that Pepsi's colas and chips are why people are obese, and that such obesity raises for the state, social and health costs. So to help the state keep its taxpayer-funded coffers full, and the vassals slim at the middle, Pepsi must be stopped.

Ha ha ha.

Pepsi's chips and colas aren't why people are obese. Its like the way the argument's framed by liberals about guns in America. Liberals say guns are why people are shot. Common sense shows otherwise. Guns don't kill. People do. Similarly, people are why people are overweight. Its irresponsible eating habits and lifestyles that cause obesity. So if you wanna shove the blame dirt on someone, aim it squarely at people and their irresponsible selves. Again, its not as if colas and chips are are why Indians are overweight. What about the Aloo Parathas, Biryanis, and Butter Chicken? 

What say Amit, kick 'em out too?

Liberal socialists can't ever shoulder responsibility. Its always someone else who is at fault. If people get shot, its guns that are to blame. If people bulge at their midriffs, it must be colas and chips. If people murder and rape, it has to do with past abuse they've suffered. There's always a reason liberals look to, to absolve themselves of any responsibility. Which explains why they always come up with 'regulation by the state' as the eternal solution.

Truth is, regulation by the state is what constitutes tyranny. If Amit and his acolytes want stop to Pepsi and its investment outcomes, all they have to do is get consumers to not buy chips and cola. That's the only legitimate way to regulate. Guess what, the liberals won't do it because they know they can't. Plus they won't ever get it. They have been programmed to prefer subservience to the state over liberty. 

Not me. I won't take the road to slavery. 

Neither should you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…