Skip to main content

The Right to Discriminate!

When administrative law judge Robert N. Spencer ordered Jack Phillips to serve a gay couple a cake they wanted for their wedding, what he really did was order away Jack's right to discriminate. 

Yeah, you heard it right. Jack has the right to discriminate. So do you. So do I.

The right to discriminate is a fundamental right. As part of the right to discriminate, you and I as business owners have the right to NOT serve any customer we may not want to. Now our discrimination against certain customers may be perceived as distasteful by others, but that 'distasteful right' still remains, and must remain our right!

The constitutional guarantee to the 'right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness' needs to be understood and interpreted right, especially the right listed at the end. Note, its a right to the pursuit of happiness, NOT HAPPINESS itself. Everyone can pursue happiness, but everyone can't demand the outcome, namely happiness.

The right to a cake for a wedding IS NOT a fundamental right. The right to buy or bake a cake is a fundamental right, but that right stops at my doorstep when I as seller exercise my fundamental right not sell to you. My right to not sell to you does not mean you can't pursue your right to buy a cake elsewhere. You can. That's your right. But you can't make me sell to you. That IS NOT your right!

Judge Robert N. Spencer has exceeded his call as a judge in 'guaranteeing happiness' to Charlie Craig and David Mullins. He has gone beyond what the constitution stipulates, and has guaranteed happiness itself to its pursuers. The ruling is dead wrong, because it took away Jack Phillips' right as a citizen to pursue his own sense of happiness, albeit through his right not to sell.

The right to discriminate is practiced by both consumers and marketers in their everyday lives. When consumers choose one brand over another, they discriminate. When marketers decide to target one set of consumers with a value proposition, they automatically turn exclusionary. They discriminate against other consumers when they favor one set (read, target segment) with a product or a service.

I agree, discrimination may at times turn distasteful, but that's no reason why it can't be practiced. Liberals may see Jack's act as a distasteful discriminatory one. But then what about forcing Jack to go against his own religious beliefs? Why isn't that equally distasteful?

So again, the right we have are those of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Not happiness itself. That in turn gives Jack and the rest of us the right to discriminate, even at the expense of others' unhappiness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…