Skip to main content

Why Kerala did not vote Narendra Modi

Isn't it interesting that amidst the stupendous capture of Lok Sabha seats pretty much across all of India by the Narendra Modi led BJP, the state of Kerala still did not give the triumphant party a single seat? Isn't it worth asking why the most literate state in India did not buy into Modifesto?

Here's why.

Modifesto was a promise for better times in the future for Indian citizenry, and such a promise connected like crazy with Indian voters reeling under the previous government's misrule. Meaning, almost all of India barring Kerala 'perceptually' bought into a promise of Modi led government making their lives better. The Malayalee on the hand didn't, simply because he ISN'T looking to a better future, especially one promised by government.

The malayalee already enjoys a prosperous present (global reports compare the standard of living of the malayalee to what's enjoyed by citizenry in developed nations). Note, Kerala's prosperity is not due to government, its despite it. Malayalees owe their high standard of living to their PERSONAL TOILS OVERSEAS! Their money was made via their personal toil, sweat, and blood in the Gulf, in the US., and elsewhere. Its the malayalees' foreign exchange remittances made out of careful savings that's raised their standard of living. Its not government that did them any favors, in fact the former have only made life more miserable for the average malayalee, and so promises by government of a better life have no impact on him.

Not so across India.

Along the length and breadth of our great nation people want a better future for themselves, and they saw it in the promise made by Narendra Modi. They therefore voted en masse for him. In many ways in a marketing context too, when it comes to buying for the first time, consumers buy into a promise. They buy on perceptions. Indian voters bought into a promise in overwhelming numbers.

Here's wishing our new Prime Minister the very best in delivering on that promise to India. Congratulations, Mr. Modi. 


R.V. said…
According to the blog, Kerala seems isolated from the mainstream politics of the country. Any perceptive Indian can't remain aloof from the aspirational change symbolized by Narendra Modi. However some inroads have apparently been made by BJP/NDA in Kerala, even though it failed to win a single seat. The mention about Kerala by Narendra Modi in his speech in Delhi today is indicative of the state's significance in his eyes.
Ray Titus said…
Ever heard free markets? Limited Government, perhaps? Being a libertarian free marketer, I am not in awe of government. The only job I believe government has is preservation of liberty. So I am not in raptures at the mention of Kerala in the speech.

I'll wait and watch. After all, talk is cheap. Just so you know, the latest statement coming out from the BJP says multibrand retail in India is still not welcome. Meaning for now the bania community scores over consumers!

Change, eh? Like I said its early days! :)

P.S. - If interested, I'd recommend a read of the Milton Friedman classic, 'Free to choose'. Or at least watch the video series.
lovableguyoncam said…
This comment has been removed by the author.

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).