Skip to main content

Marketers win where Parents fail

Most dysfunctional adult behavior can be traced back to lousy parenting. What's of course tragic is most parents never know they've dished out rules and norms that have stunted the maturing process for their children. What's even more tragic is kids who grow up never realize they were recipients of lousy parenting.

Guess what's the fallout of that? A continuation of lousy parenting. Down generations.

Neither the parent, not the child who grows up to be a parent ever realize something was wrong with the way they parented, or were subject to parenting. The reason why such realization doesn't see the light of day is twofold. One, the practice of self-reflection is scarce. Meaning, parents almost never sit down to question their parenting. Kids who grow up to be parents too resist assessing the parenting they were subject to, which is why they continue with dysfunctional parenting that then keeps dysfunctional behavior alive and kicking across generations.

The second reason why realization is scarce is because culturally we are tuned to not question. Parents being raised onto pedestals via social conditioning means any questioning of parenting (or anything else) is not just encouraged, it may even be met with hostility. In fact, I can almost sense and feel the heckles this post may raise among the converted who are tied to their illusions via their socio-cultural omerta pledges!

Face it. Squarely. Most adult dysfunctional behavior is bred via lousy parenting!

The practice of marketing on the other hand, unlike parenting, cannot survive if there's no practice of reflection. Thankfully, marketers engage in greater reflection than parents. They know consumers far more than parents know their children. Which explains why marketers outdo parents in exacting loyalty.

I know. Pity. 

Comments

Storewars News said…
Nice read! Very informative. Did you know that Chinese firms find Google helpful. Full story here: http://bit.ly/1jdXDAC.
Epic Research describe you all the things whenever you are going to join share market.It provides Indian and global market news.

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).