Skip to main content

Why the Economist's take on illegal immigration is daft

I am not surprised the Economist parades 'facts' to counter the anti-refugee sentiments prevailing among sections of the American public. Its important to note facts aka statistics spread falsehoods as much as they inform us of what is 'really' happening. So for example, statistically the probability that someone invades your home and causes you and your family harm if you leave your doors open at night may be minuscule based on historical data analysis. Is that then reason for you to leave your doors ajar at night? What if that minuscule statistic to the contrary becomes you?

Its easy to conclude that a minuscule percentage cause all harm in society. However, if you construe that as no requirements for precautions on your side, that ushers you into the hallways of rank idiocy, a known bastion of liberal thought. I am willing to concede illegal immigrants may still not be the big problem, but illegal immigration surely is! Why? 'Cos it breaks laws! A society that actively condones breaking of laws will look down the barrel sometime in the future. By then illegal immigrants may 'really' have become the problem!

In marketing too, its important to know how to construe data analysis. Take for example, digital adoption rates. Low numbers for now (1 in 6 Indians goes online) shouldn't prompt a marketer from dropping the virtual platform from their marketing radar. Sure, consumers may not be on now, but they will by the time you blink. By then it would be too late as competition may have whizzed past you.

As for the issue of illegal immigration, every country has a responsibility to first look after its own citizens. Just like every family needs to look out for itself before it looks at others. Stepping up for others in need must be done, and done voluntarily with necessary precautions. So folks, never mind statistical data, keep you doors shut at night and open them to charity when the sun is up and your'e sure its safe!

Stay safe. Stay well.

Comments

Unknown said…
After reading this informative article i must say that, this is one of the fantastic website to get the news and information about market. Epic Research also provides free tips and recommendations.

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…