Skip to main content

Why Stephen Hawking can't get the Donald Trump phenomenon

Its simple why Stephen can't get his head around the Donald. He's a physicist. He may understand the laws of the universe, but has no clue when it comes to laws of human behaviour. Plus the liberal he is, its understandable why he doesn't want to exercise his mind on anything that may not agree with what he's made up his mind on.

Its easy to understand Donald Trump's rise if you can open your mind to research that shows people identify with those that 'speak' and 'stand' for them. Its the way people associate with celebrities. Theory tells us celebrity appeal flows from the 'stars' being 'attractive', 'credible', or 'powerful'. Attractiveness leads to association, credibility prompts internalisation, and power ensures compliance.

In the case of the Donald, I bet all three are happening. His supporters identify with him 'cos he stands tall and courageous in the face of liberal onslaughts, see his message of the wall and strong borders as credible and so internalise it, and finally see him as a powerful businessman on the wrong side of Washington, and so comply to his calls. Now whether that's good or bad is another topic of discussion. For now it would be well for Hawking to understand human behaviour so he isn't left tearing his hair out wondering why the Donald's on the rise.

Will Hawking make the effort to understand? Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn!

Comments

Unknown said…
This was an enlightening read! Thank you for sharing :)

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).