Skip to main content

If Donald Trump loses, a Brand fails, & an Academic can't deliver, who is to blame?

Frankly I am amused when I hear Sean Hannity say the blame for a Trump loss should be heaped on Cruz and others. Sean's got it dead wrong. If Trump loses, it will be Trump who is to blame. In fact if Trump loses, it will be the Icarus Paradox rearing up all over again!

Its the weak who point fingers at others. Agreed, there may have been the external enablers, but failures ultimately must be pinned on those who make the decisions. For example, instead of gunning after Cruz, Trump can focus on his real opponent. If he doesn't and it costs him, its squarely his fault. In the marketplace, if a brand can't exact consumer patronage, blame the marketer and every other business function responsible for the brand. Now I am not shunning failure, I am only 'justly' pinning the blame. All marketer mishaps are in the end failures of marketing decision making. In theory we'd say the marketer messed up on decisions taken on the marketing mix variables. Either they got the product wrong, or the price, or the communication, or distribution and retailing, and so on.

Now what's true for marketers, businesses, and Donald Trump is true for academics too. If as an academic I fall short in the classroom, despite all external enablers to that failure, the blame must be mine and mine alone. I got it wrong.



Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).