Skip to main content

Who's the real culprit in Kaali-Peeli & Uber-Ola war?

Back in May, Scroll, a regulation loving publication ran a story with the headline,
'Unfair competition? How Uber and Ola are killing livelihoods of Mumbai's auto and taxi drivers'. I chanced upon the article while searching for a story on Kaali-Peeli taxis hitting back at App based competition with discounted fares.

I wish the guys at Scroll knew who the real culprit always is when it comes to killing of livelihoods. So everybody, here's the bare naked truth! Its consumers! Consumers are who snatch away livelihoods of business owners by refusing to extend their patronage. Don't blame competition. Blame consumers. When consumers use Ola and Uber to call for taxis, they deny Kaali-Peelis their livelihoods. Of course, the million dollar question is, what can the Kaali-Peelis do? Simple. Earn back consumer patronage. Create better value for those who keep them in business in comparison to competition!

So here's the market wisdom all businesses must heed. Consumers shut down your businesses, not competition. They do so by taking their patronage to your competitors. If you want your shutters to open every morning, you better obsess every previous night on how to deliver to consumers, superior value.

If you can't and you don't, you will go the Kaali-Peeli way. That's a guarantee.


Unknown said…
The "Kaali-Peeli" and the OLA n Uber are barely any competition..In today's market where the app based cab services are generating immensely superior customer value everyday, the normal taxis are only degrading themselves (poor customer relation, lack of sophistication, inferior quality cabs, etc.).. For them to survive against the giants, they either need to give a major competition to them on the fares or generate a value that "OLBER" has not generated yet..

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).