Skip to main content

Breakfast toast & the curse of culture.

I make a request for toast at a breakfast buffet and the guy behind the counter reaches for the loaf with his hands. I am not happy. I don’t want him touching anything I’ll be eating. However the thing is, it ain’t his fault. Despite probably all the teaching and training, reaching for the loaf with their fingers is what comes naturally to most people this part of the world. Yeah, even in the food business. In fact that’s default behaviour, courtesy culture.

In the Indian subcontinent eating with your hands is the norm. It’s part of culture. No one bothers having a second thought about the practice as it part of our unquestioned everyday life. If hands are used to eat, they will be issued to make and serve. It doesn’t matter that the time and place is a commercial breakfast buffet. Now these kinds of unconsciously extended behaviour is true for all cultures. If you think about the effect of culture long enough, you’ll see that much of people’s thoughtless everyday acts are prompted by the ‘invisible hand’. To me that is unfortunate to say the least. Though the cultural norms and practices we imbibe unconsciously make it easy for us to go about our everyday lives, it does us all a disservice by eliminating cognitive effort that is supposed to precede behaviour.

If the guy behind the counter has to switch from his hands to using tongs he will have to make a cognitive effort to shake off culture’s stranglehold. Extrapolate that, and this is what you get. You wanna change a regressive society you will have rid it of a regressive culture. As long as culture stays, default behaviours stay. Now is it possible to abandon culture? My answer, no. The only way to make culture, or at least a part of it to go away is to bring other cultures in and get them to assimilate. The good news is, that’s already happening. Around the world. That is, foreign cultures are criss-crossing and are coming in via tech. and media infrastructures. They’ve already begun their behaviour changing act. The evidence is in altered social behaviour.

Now as for me, I have hope about my toast. It may take a while, but change is coming.

Rejoice, people. 


Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).