Skip to main content

What the film 'Raw' can teach experiential brands


Take a bow, Julia Ducournau. With 'Raw' you've done what most 'experiential brands' dream of pulling off. You've provided compelling evidence via your first set of consumers/viewers how shockingly scary your movie can be. The poor sods who fainted during your movie's midnight screening have done you the biggest favor ever. They've told us, the rest, volumes about your film without uttering a word!

Way to go, Julia!

So here's the 'raw' lesson. For experiential brands to work (or for that matter other brands too), the first set of consumers must go gaga (or 'pass out') and do the 'talking'. They must 'tell' of their experiences so the 'masses' are convinced about the promise made by the brand. Julia and her marketing team didn't tell me a word about 'Raw'. The Toronto film goers did, via the media. Now I am thinking of going when the movie hits Bangalore.

I'm just hoping I don't go the Toronto way. ;) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).