Skip to main content

The business reason why 'News' is never 'News', but 'Propaganda'.


For any product or service to survive in a marketplace it must gather consumer patronage. No buyers means no survival. Now how does a brand become the choice of consumers? By turning itself into a proposition that finds value with them. Such value assessment made by consumers must turn into a trade where consumers part with their money for the brand.

The ‘business’ of news is similar to any other business. Don’t ever bother believing news is about ‘telling the truth’. It isn’t. Period.

Why?

‘Cos there’s pretty much no one out there in the ‘real world’ in search for the ‘truth’. What people aka citizens seek is their ‘version of the truth’. So they’ll end up listening to whoever piles them with their desired version. For news to ‘sell’ it has be dished out in a version sought by its target set of listeners. So for example, CNN dishes ‘news’ (read, propaganda) that satisfies its liberal followers. If CNN were to present the ‘objective truth’ (whatever that is), I’ll guarantee a loss of viewers. So day after day, what CNN dishes out is liberal propaganda that’s lapped lock stock and barrel by its liberal viewers. Ditto for Fox News, a channel on the other end of the spectrum. Ditto for India, where news channels even unleash prime time buffoonery guised as news. They do so ‘cos they perfectly know that’s what their viewers want! It’s what keeps their TRPs intact! The eyeballs from faithful followers is what keeps the fourth estate thriving, raking in the moolah that comes via advertising.

Tell you what, almost all news channels aka the fourth estate, faithfully dispense propaganda day after day. Now I am not faulting them for what they do. As a marketer I fully understand why they deal in the business of propaganda. I only wish they stop telling us they are acts aimed at supplying truth, and admit they peddle propaganda guised as news for their target audiences.

Of course, I know they won’t and guess what, that’s marketing too. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).