Skip to main content

Who is superior, Man or Woman? What about Marketers?

I am not about to rehash the jaded argument about how women have broken the ceiling in all arenas. Of course, they have.

So?

I don’t believe in the nonsense of ‘equality’. Truth is, nothing is ever equal. A few things are superior and better, most are nowhere close. So have women attained equal status with men? I don’t know, and frankly I don’t care. ‘Cos in my book, the woman I know and have lived with for a decade and half is clearly superior! To me!

Why?

Before I tell you that, here’s my two cents on superior beings. Unlike what you’ve been told to believe, it isn’t about the fancy title at work or social status that dictate people’s place in society. That’s mere social varnish; stuff people adorn themselves with so they can pretend they are on the ‘top’. It is a pity that’s what they are telling women to go after. Rising to the ‘top’ of humankind isn’t about acquiring the blings and swags.  Instead it is about personal mastery. The superior being is one who has bravely unravelled the self, keeping it in check, mining it for purposes of psychological growth. The superior being is one who’s able to step outside the selfish, stifling confines of oneself to grow others. At home, the lady of the house is amazing grace under pressure. Class at all times, in mind and spirit. Therefore almost never a terrible thought, and everything she does reeks of dignity and poise.
   
I’ve always wondered how she got here. Maybe its genetics, maybe conditioning, maybe even faith. Frankly, I don’t know.

Now to the world of business and marketing. Superior marketers aren’t the noise makers. They are the quiet ones solidly delivering on customer value. In doing so, they have taken their people along. They’ve done it with a culture that’s open and transparent. Also, they’ve gone beyond themselves with a purpose that includes others in society. They’ve done it for real, and not as CSR varnish. I agree, such marketers and businesses are rare. Guess what, that’s true for people too. It is the rare man or woman who is superior!

Happy Women’s Day, folks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).