Skip to main content

The problem with pointing fingers at 'movie screen misogyny'.

The idea of course is noble and praise worthy. However the focus and methodology is all wrong. I am talking about the video featuring IPS women police officers training their guns on movie content for propagating misogyny and the influence it has on Indian youth.

So here's the problem. There's no doubt Indian movie fare is misogynistic. However to identify celluloid content as the culprit is akin to barking up the wrong tree. To deduce the 'real culprit' behind misogyny, you have to differentiate between normative behavior, social environments, and symbolic environments. Misogyny as part of normative behavior in youth or adults is an outcome of social conditioning via a default social environment. Pray, what drives such environmental influences? The default culture in place. Collectivist cultures that discourage and even bar individual expressions, unfortunately, dish out worse restrictive norms for women. I mean, within such cultures women have it worse (in comparison to the individual). Young people who grow up within such stifling liberty-denying social environments (discriminatory towards women and disadvantageous groups in particular) end up imbibing misogyny as a behavioral norm. The tragedy is, within such social sanction, they don't and can't identify misogyny as wicked.

Media, entertainment and its offshoots represent symbolic environments and toe the line and boundaries provided by social norms. So here's what happens. If misogyny is part of culture, it will creep into media and entertainment content and pass off as perfectly legitimate. An evidence to this is the hoots and whistles misogynistic content on screens receive from their cinema audiences. So you see, misogyny in Indian cinema is a natural outcome of social misogyny. It ain't the other way round. That is, local celluloid isn't setting the norm, its fastidiously following it.

If police officers want to fix misogyny in society they must start with fixing culture and social environments that influence normative behavior. The best illustration to the social stifling of individualistic choices by youth in India is the recent Youth survey. You see, culture is the culprit. It's why the young in India can't seem to agree to individual choices (for example, the choice of what to eat) that are contrary to what is acceptable social behavior.

My bet is, it'll be a while  before misogyny is given the boot in Indian movies. Why? 'Cos it'll be a while before current culture-driven social norms that don't see a wee bit of problem with misogyny is given the boot!

Comments

nabilmubarak said…
Are you tired of seeking loans and Mortgages,have you been turned down constantly By your banks and other financial institutions,We offer any form of loan to individuals and corporate bodies at low interest rate.If you are interested in taking a loan,feel free to contact us today,we promise to offer you the best services ever.Just give us a try,because a trial will convince you.What are your Financial needs?Do you need a business loan?Do you need a personal loan?Do you want to buy a car?Do you want to refinance?Do you need a mortgage loan?Do you need a huge capital to start off your business proposal or expansion? Have you lost hope and you think there is no way out, and your financial burdens still persists? Contact us (gaincreditloan1@gmail.com)

Your Name:...............
Your Country:...............
Your Occupation:...............
Loan Amount Needed:...............
Loan Duration...............
Monthly Income:...............
Your Telephone Number:.....................
Business Plan/Use Of Your Loan:...............
Contact Us At : gaincreditloan1@gmail.com
Phone number :+44-75967-81743 (WhatsApp Only)

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).