Skip to main content

Note, it’s a Consumer problem, not a Pepsi problem.

So there are many out there lauding Virat Kohli’s decision to disassociate with Pepsi. While I agree that Kohli is free to do what he wants based on his ‘values’, I wonder what it is that makes people think Pepsi is the problem.

Why is that fingers always point towards brands, and never at buyers/consumers? Is it a convenient way to absolve all personal responsibility? I guess it’s easier for us to say the ‘fork made me fat’ than take a deep look at our gluttonous ways. Pepsi and Virat glugging the frothy liquid on screen is why I am unhealthy, we charge! It ain’t us, it’s them! The brands are the bad guys, we are just innocent gullible victims.

Yeah, right!

In free marketplaces, buyers have every right not to buy anything they believe isn’t in their best interests. Of course, that many a times is an outcome of self-control, which in turn requires that we drop our notions of victim-hood.

Note, that’s how the Pepsi problem gets solved!


Unknown said…
Sir. But in case of children . they dont know what is good or bad for them. I mean under 10 age. Though I am all for freedom of consumer's
archna sinha said…

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Wearing Cuba means Walking Cuba

There's something ethereal about wearing 'Cuba'. Suddenly its the streets of Havana, smoke filled and lit by the groovin', more than the lights. The bars are packed to hilt and dreamy women seem to glide by. The feeling's beyond magical.

How did I get there?

Before I explain, I gotta tell you about the power of brands to take you places. Brands bring with them an ability to prompt you to conjure up the unreal. They can transform your reality into fantasy. And consumers are more than willing partners to brands as the drudgery they face in everyday life begs an injection of fantasy. Brands that operate in a zone of the unreal do the conjuring act as there's nothing else that consumers can call for, while making judgements. For instance, what should I be judging the lip paint on? Its colour and tone or its ability to turn me into a diva?

Cuba's a perfume. The moment I wear it, I am traipsing the streets of Havana. Its smoke filled bars I see. Its music I hear and…