Skip to main content

The Marketing Lesson Emmanuel Macron should learn

Amateur enthusiasm makes for lousy marketing. The former is what Emmanuel Macron should be wary about in the wake of his amateur clarion call to American scientists, entrepreneurs etc.. He wanted the lot from across the Atlantic to come running over to France. now that Trump's America is out of the Paris Accord.

Macron should take lessons in Marketing, especially this one. He needs to know great marketing starts with the buyer. To sell anything including an 'invite', you must first know how buyers buy. Now take a look at France as a business destination proposition. According to the 'Ease of Doing Business Index', France dropped one place from 28 in 2016, to 29. Meaning this year, its gotten slightly more difficult to do business in France. Where is the US currently at? 8. It dropped one place from last year. A drop of one place to 8 for the US has people up in arms. If that be the case, imagine France at 29!

You see, Macron needs to understand that smart scientists and businessmen don't process marketing messages at a peripheral level based on emotions. On the contrary, resource commitment requirements push decision-making into the rational zone; meaning decision makers will first process information before coming to conclusions. That in turn means Macron's message will be heard but not heeded. Why? 'Cos investors, on processing information, will learn that France in comparison to the US is almost 4 times more worse off when it comes to 'ease of doing business'!

Tho' it's early days for Macron, it is time he smarts up on making France a talent and investment destination. That means he and his government machinery should work on easing regulations so it's easier for people to come, work and invest in France. If I could give Macron some advice, I'd say get over cowboy handshakes and amateur emotive videos. Fast.

Then go learn some Marketing! 


Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).