Skip to main content

What plagues service at LG, Shoppers Stop, & at our Milkman’s.


Yeah, ownership. That’s the problem that plagues ShoppersStop, LG, and our Milkman. Here’s how.

It’s been four App based transactions at ShoppersStop that’s been declined with my Digital Wallet being debited. I’ve therefore had to write to the retailer four times to have the transaction reversed. Funny, despite my endless talk with customer care personnel nobody seems to care enough to fix the problem.

A few days ago I find a pack of rodent offspring napping in our washing machine. The mechanic tells me rodent-mommy has eaten her way through the plastic sheet at the bottom of the machine. He tells me I should fasten the bottom with a metal wire sheet. I ask the manager at LG as to why the brand can’t take care of a rodent problem while manufacturing (by having a metal sheet at the bottom)? He tells me all machines are manufactured with plastic sheets (that rodents can have for breakfast, I guess). Funny, he cares two hoots about the ‘rodent misery I’ve been through.

The Milk delivery guy at our place knows we’ve run out of coupons and that we need the next set. Our guess was that he will pass on that information to his proprietor so new coupons are sent to our apartment. He doesn’t. Truth is, he doesn’t care about our running out of milk.

Why is that people at these firms don’t care? Simple. They (and related others at the firm) don’t take ownership of a customer problem. Frankly, they don’t care. Why? You see, it’s an organisational design problem. The three elements that make up design are structure, control/reward, and culture. My immediate guess is, all these firms have got lousy organisational designs in place (I am hoping I am wrong). The structures they’ve put in place don’t impress on employee responsibility and accountability. What makes it worse is that employees over the years see no reward in taking ownership. My bet is, at times such ownership can even be dangerous with employees being accused of messing up. So they take the easy way out. They tell themselves, ‘not my problem’. What piles on the dysfunctionality in such firms probably is a weak culture. One that places no emphasis on collectively responding to customer needs and problems. Note, culture starts at the top. You breed bureaucratic sycophancy at the top, and what you get is employees sucking up and covering their ‘you know what’.

Plus Zero Ownership.

What a pity. 


Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).