Skip to main content

Why Americans should thank Russians & Potential Buyers should thank Consumers.

For the life of me, I can't understand why American liberals are crying hoarse over Russian interference in their Presidential elections. There's even a Wiki page on the subject, for crying out loud!

Now how is it interference if, when the Americans went to polls, they had complete control over who they voted for?  Last I checked, all the Russians did was leak material that could influence an American's Presidential vote. You call that interference? What would you then call the millions of Ad dollars Hillary spent to influence American voters? Legitimate interference? Then you brand the Russian leaks as illegitimate? Give me a break! If fact, Americans should be thanking the former Commies! The leaks they did gave US. citizens access to 'credible' information about a candidate and the party, in comparison to the syrupy garbage and half-truths they got via campaign advertising. Now, don't tell me you are angry the Russians didn't leak Trump info. Of course, they didn't! Why should they? They weren't doing what they did for anyone else's sake than their own! Just like the Hillary guys looked out only for what benefited them. Sure, they said it was about the American people. Seriously, you believe that?!

Hey, aren't we all looking out for ourselves?! What's so new about that?!

In the Marketing world, buyers should thank digital media platforms and consumers who throng it. 'Cos the latter tell us potential buyers their experiences as consumers. Helps us get credible information about brands in comparison to the illusionary garbage advertising piles on to us. Tell you what, as a buyer I am delighted to have 'real' information about brands from my fellow consumers.

On a similar note, I recommend the Americans thank the Russians! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).