Skip to main content

Here’s what the Federal Bank Ad can teach you about your goals.

The folks at Federal Bank think their Ad cuts through the clutter because its ‘youthful, light-veined, and cheeky’. That may be true, but what really sets the Ad apart is the way it presents the playing out of people’s goals at ‘multiple levels’ with superb clarity. I don’t know if Ogilvy & Mather incorporated the goal angle in the story-line by design, or if it’s just plain good luck; whatever, here’s why the Ad scores and shines through the clutter and noise marketers bombard buyers with.

To figure why the Ad’s a winner, you have to get to the heart of human goals and how they are pursued. You see, the goals we go after operate at three levels, namely, the ‘subordinate’, ‘focal’, and ‘super-ordinate’. What’s most apparent, and that drives our motives is the focal goal. Yet what most people fail to recognise or realise is that, it’s the super-ordinate goal (that’s more psychogenic in nature), that’s at the heart of most human drives. Let me explain this in the context of the Federal Bank Ad.

The Ad talks about why you should seek a car loan from the bank by demonstrating the effect having a sedan has on the kind of treatment you receive. In this case it’s a valet parking scenario. Now the three goals that play out in the sequence are these. The subordinate goal is that of landing a car loan at a competitive rate. The focal goal is a sedan to drive around in. The super-ordinate goal? Status in the eyes of others. The Ad is effectively proving to you that if you make good on a loan from the bank to buy a sedan, you can be rest assured about your cherished status goal! Believable? You bet! Never mind the spiritual stuff that warns us of our consumerist ways, the truth is, the way to ‘gaining respect’ from others is via sedans, and other such stuff! You drive a budget hatchback, you’re a nobody. A luxury sedan, and you’ll have valets bending over backwards!

I’ve always believed in the need for brands to hammer away at super-ordinate goals nursed by humans. It’s the psychological stuff that drives us all. Again, it’s the promise of psychological fulfilment that allows brands to hit the bulls-eye with buyers, and cut through a marketing environment characterised by noise overloads. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).