Skip to main content

The Marketing lesson in how Jet Airways got me to buy Josy’s book.

Since the time I’ve known about Josy Joseph’s book, ‘A Feast of Vultures’, I’ve been meaning to buy and read it. I didn’t do the buying for a while as I was immersed in Simonsen & Rosen’s brilliant book ‘Absolute Value’. Then the Jet Airways lawsuit happened. I decided it was time to buy Josy’s book. If the book had got a corporate house to go to court, it’s gotta be a must-read. A neat discount at an online retailer sealed the buying click.

I don’t know if Josy should thank Jet for getting me to buy his book, but tell you what, the airline’s lawsuit was the trigger. It sealed my decision to buy and got the ‘buying click’ done. So here’s how you should see my buying act and here’s what you can learn from it. Until Jet’s pushback on Josy, I was inclined positively to the prospect of buying the book. In behavioural parlance that means two of the three components that make up attitude, namely the cognitive (belief element) and the affective (feel element) were aligned firmly in favour of ‘A Feast of Vultures’. Yet the buying act (the final conative element in attitude) didn’t go through. That push happened with Jet’s lawsuit.

You see, for an actual buy to happen the three elements (cognitive, affective, and conative) that make up attitudes we harbour towards products and brand must fall ‘positively’ into place. Many times (as in this case) we may ‘feel good’ and ‘believe the rights things’ about a brand, yet a buy may not still happen. For that, a final trigger must be pulled (the legendary Joe Sugarman taught me that)!

Figuring what that trigger is for a buyer or a particular set of buyers may be the difference between making a sale and losing one.

P.S. – What about Josy’s book? Take my word, if you are courageous enough to want to know the ‘real India’, read ‘A Feast of Vultures’. 


Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).