Skip to main content

Now that Grandma likes him, here’s what brand Rahul Gandhi must do.


The latest on social media and other media platforms doing the rounds about Rahul Gandhi is a sweet li’l story; that of Grandma wanting to meet Rahul Gandhi on her 107th birthday. This was conveyed to the man himself via his twitter handle. Smartly, the response came real-time. Rahul Gandhi tweeted a personal birthday and Xmas message to Grandma. Plus a hug.

Now that’s a story that could light up a smile (even among citizen fence-sitters). Make no mistake, what brand Rahul has done with such genuine deft touches is upped the ‘likability’ quotient. Does that matter? You bet, it does! However, such likability isn’t enough as brand Rahul must now move into ‘credibility’ territory. The latter is the conversion zone, one that will matter at the ballot boxes. So here’s the social science behind what I am recommending. Social Psychology research has thrown light on the impact of what is termed ‘source attractiveness’ and ‘source credibility’. Remember, all political parties and their respective leaders go out to get citizens to buy into all their talk about what they stand for, and their promises of a better future.   

Such ‘sweet’ talks must first find an audience that’s willing to listen. Much of such initial receptivity depends on ‘source attractiveness’, which in turn depends on the source’s ‘familiarity’ and ‘likability’. The Grandma story and similar ones are hitting home runs to seal ‘familiarity’ and ‘likability’ for brand Rahul. In buying (read, voting) terms this means brand Rahul is gliding in nicely into the consideration set of citizen decision makers. Will they cast their lot with the brand? Now that depends on ‘source credibility’. Social Psychology research reveals that for a message to seem ‘credible’ and therefore get ‘internalized’ by the receiver, the source must be perceived as an ‘expert’ and ‘trustworthy’. Here’s where brand Rahul needs more work. Having crossed the attractiveness hurdle, he must now gallop towards greater credibility by dispensing messages that center around issues that require expert handling. Clarity on issues of governance and growth conveyed in trustworthy manners is what will seal the issue of ‘credibility’ for brand Rahul.

If that were to happen (i.e., attractiveness + credibility), I can bet the ballots will turn. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).