Skip to main content

Making Sense & Marketing Sense of Doggy, Human, and Brand Love.

Considering I've been there myself, I get the doggy-love thing. Sure its Oxytocin flooding the brain that gets the love going, but there's more to the love humans share with dogs. Doggy love is 'easy' you see. The creature in question is wired to give you what you need and ask for less in return. Doggy love is probably as unconditional as love can get. For humans there's so much to get from doggy love, and there's no compulsion to give. There's no playing games, there's no having to worry about heartaches. Dogs love despite what humans are! It also helps that dogs don't do the jealousy thing as badly as humans do, and will have their masters' back anytime, every time! In fact, dogs may even love people more than their canine brethren.

Step into human love territory and the scene changes dramatically. When it comes to loving people, there's quite some 'labor' to be put in. Reciprocity to such loving effort can't be guaranteed. Between humans, the back and forth of love is almost never even-keeled. Its no wonder then love between humans is such a messy affair.

In the world of business and marketing, there's such a thing as brand love. There's enough research out there that proves consumers 'get into' relationships with brands. Here are the different phases of brand love according to Tim Halloran, and here's how you can measure it. Tell you what, brand love works just like doggy love. The brand 'gives unconditionally' like doggies do. It enables its buyers to fulfil needs that operate in social and psychological territories. So for example, the torn jeans brand allows the young man to live out his fantasy of rebellion, which is why he reciprocates with love. Note, without the ripped denim the young man would have no means to tell the world his contrived story. The tattoo, bandana, and the bad-ass bike are all love objects for a demographic that uses brands to satiate psychogenic needs.

The deep bonds dogs and humans have should fill us with wonder. I see it as a miracle of nature. As to the love between consumers and brands, now that's territory of marketing magic. One that should fill us with awe!


Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).