Skip to main content

The 3 compelling reasons why Flipkart's push notification got a click-through.

I am traveling to work, and as usual the push notifications start coming in on my mobile phone. Most I just glance at and close. In fact data shows open-rates for push notifications are dropping (though it’s still better than text messages and e-mails). Then the big daddy of online retail, Flipkart slips one in. It reads against a colorful-picturey background, ‘Jaw Dropping Deals! Only for 4 hours! Take a Peek! 

I open my first notification for the day. 

Here are 3 reasons why I did it.

1. Arrested Attention – The first line that read ‘jaw dropping deals’ caught my attention. Though I am used to notifications proclaiming ‘great deals’ almost all the time, this one sounded better. This particular one was promising me deals that would be ‘jaw dropping’. My curiosity was piqued, and that was the first trigger that gave the notification a chance at a click-through.

2. Persuasive Consideration – When the notification said ‘4 hours’, it meant now was my only chance at figuring what the deals were. Once I got to work, I wouldn’t find the time. Plus if the four hours elapsed, I’d miss out on probably a few super deals. By bringing in a time-constraint the notification further triggered me to consider an immediate open. 

3. Cheeky Action – For brands a buy-in ultimately makes sense only when communiques finally prompt consumers to act. Flipkart’s notification was teasing me to take a peek. It was in a way saying, ‘Go on, take a look; it won’t hurt. It’s only a peek, dude’. I agreed. It was just a peek. After all, how much time would it take? Of course, my curiosity got the better of me.

The click-through was achieved.

Take a bow, Flipkart. 

Read a few surprising facts about open rates for push notifications here.


Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).