Skip to main content

The 4 Marketing Communication lessons in Van Heusen Flex’s UFC showdown commercial


Sure, Van Heusen Flex has been around for a while now, but the use of UFC superstars, Stephen Thompson and TJ Dillashaw in a just released spot has hit the right notes in terms of novelty. Does the new communique work for the brand and the differential it’s trying to convey to its target group? I for one am convinced, and here are 4 reasons why.  

It’s BELIEVABLE – The believability factor is the key to getting a differential to be accepted and internalized. Buyers must believe in the veracity of what is being conveyed. Who better to convey flex and what it can do than UFC superstars? If there are people who stretch, twist, and turn, it must be them, right?

It’s WATCHABLE – Never mind the differential, the first challenge marketing communicators face is to get buyers to pick their communique from among the clutter. Note, buyers are wired to block communiques. This one cuts through the clutter with the stars and the sequence it features. For its target audience, this one is a standout to be picked for viewing.

It’s ASPIRATIONAL – A conspicuous category product will have much going for it if it can push its target buyers into the ‘aspirational’ zone. To aspire, buyers must be exposed to imagery that prompts admiration while simultaneously getting them to mull over their own inadequacies. To adorn clothes that fit and stretch when needed on bodies like those the UFC fighters sport is what men fantasize about. Van Heusen has packaged that fantasy well and aligned it to the flex proposition in crackling style.

It’s RELATABLE – In the end, men can relate to the problems of ‘stiff’ clothing that limits body movements. Many have even suffered the ‘rip’ consequences of such clothes. The embarrassment when that happens can be only truly be understood by those who have ‘suffered’. Clothing that stretches and glues to a perfect body fit is manna from heaven for men. That they can relate perfectly well to the problem that Van Heusen Flex solves, and the way it is conveyed is why the brand’s communique hits home big time!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.


Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).