Skip to main content

My kids & the Power of Authentic Marketing

I have been seeing a delightful pattern with my kids for a while now. Every time we are out and the kids get served for example at eating joints, ‘thank yous’ from them follow without any prodding. What's more, they seem to express their gratitude with a genuinely warm smile. Alphy and I couldn't be more happier. We seemed to have got it right on both counts. One, the polite behavior, and two the genuine sentiment behind it.

When was the last time a service brand you patronized did that to you? That is, express thankfulness at your patronage, and do it genuinely. My bet is you probably would have got the thank you, but the sentiment may have been suspect. Its like when you step aboard a flight. They greet you, but you know they don't really mean the welcome. Its a mechanical act they go through, one that's part of their job description. If you ask us how we got our kids to get to where they are now with their genuine thankfulness, I would say we conditioned them right. The repetitive prodding over time habituated them to a conditioned response. Plus we raised them within a culture of gratitude. I am hoping they must have soaked that in from parental behavior (at least that's what I would like to believe).

The future of marketing in an era of digitization and artificial intelligence lies squarely in the territory of 'authenticity'. I guess that's why 'Authentic Marketing' seems to be all vogue for now. Call it what you want, genuine gratefulness and its expressions through authentic behavior is turning out to be true differentiators. If you ask me what's the difference between flying Indigo and SpiceJet, I can't for the life of me figure. Both fly you in the most blandest of manners possible. How I wish I encountered gratitude while flying. That would have sealed the deal in favor of an airline brand that expressed it!

Here's what I am hoping, that Jaden and Brooklyn grow up to a heart of genuine thankfulness and gratitude for everything they have and are given. Plus even if they don't have much, just life is worth being thankful about!

Fingers crossed, folks. 


Popular posts from this blog

Situational Involvement of Consumers

There are two types of involvement that consumers have with products and services, Situational and Enduring. Situational involvement as the term suggests, occurs only in specificsituations whereas Enduring involvement is continuous and is more permanent in nature.

Decisions to buy umbrellas in India are driven by the onset of Indian monsoon. Monsoon rains arrived in India over the South Andaman Sea on May 10 and over the Kerala coast on May 28, three days ahead of schedule. But then, after a few days of rain, South India is witnessing a spate of dry weather. Temperatures are soaring in the north of India. The Umbrella companies in the state of Kerala are wishing for the skies to open up. So is the farming community and manufacturers of rural consumer products whose product sales depend totally on the farming community. The Met. department has deemed this dry spell as 'not unusual'.

India's monsoon rains have been static over the southern coast since last Tuesday because of a…

Prior Hypothesis Bias

Prior Hypothesis bias refers to the fact that decision makers who have strong prior beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make decisions on the basis of those beliefs, even when presented with the evidence that their beliefs are wrong. Moreover, they tend to use and seek information that is consistent with their prior beliefs, while ignoring information that contradicts these beliefs.

From a strategic perspective, a CEO who has a strong prior belief that a certain strategy makes sense might continue to pursue that strategy, despite evidence that it is inappropriate or failing.

Ref : Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach, 6e, Charles W L Hill, Gareth R Jones

Consumer Spending

Carpe Diem Blog: From Visual Economics, a graphical representation appears above (click to enlarge) of Consumer Expenditures in 2007, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note that total spending on food ($6,133), clothing ($1,881) and housing ($16,920) represented 50% of consumer expenditures and 30% of income before taxes in 2007. In 1997 by comparison, 51.1% of consumer expenditures were spent on food, clothing and housing, and 44.6% of income before taxes was spent on food, clothing and housing (data here).